Peer Review

Designation as a Highly Influential Scientific Assessment
The study’s assessment report has been designated a Highly Influential Scientific Assessment (HISA). As a HISA, the draft state of the science assessment will receive meaningful and timely peer review in accordance with EPA’s peer review handbook (PDF)(190 pp, 1.7MB).

Peer Review by the Science Advisory Board
Latest
The EPA's Scientific Advisory Board (SAB) has formed an ad hoc panel of independent experts to provide periodic advice and review under the auspices of the SAB on EPA's hydraulic fracturing research. 
 

In May 2013, the panel provided EPA with individual members' feedback on its 2012 Progress Report. The panel's efforts will conclude with a peer review of the draft assessment.  

Information on the SAB Hydraulic Fracturing Advisory Panel meeting can be found here.

Information on SAB's activities related to the study can be found here

Peer Review of Study Plan (2011)
EPA considered SAB and stakeholder comments in the development of the Draft Study Plan. Four separate SAB meetings provided opportunities for public comment.
 

SAB and stakeholder comments were taken into consideration in the development of the Final Study Plan.

Peer Review of Scope (2010)
In April 2010, EPA's SAB reviewed an provided suggestions and comments on the proposed approach to the hydraulic fracturing study design and the areas to be addressed by research. 
 

Information on SAB's activities related to the proposed approach and scope of the EPA study, including the April 2010 SAB meeting materials can be found here.

Peer Review of EPA Individual Research Papers and OMB Guidelines
In addition to the SAB peer review of the draft assessment, the study's individual research projects will be peer reviewed upon their individual completion. 
 
  • Projects resulting in papers submitted to journals will be subjected to external peer review processes by the journal.
  • Projects resulting in EPA reports will undergo contractor led letter reviews by external technical experts.

Consistent with the regulations governing confidential business information (CBI), projects involving CBI may not be reviewed by external peer reviewers, but will receive internal expert peer reviews. 

For more information, please see the SAB website.
 

EPA is applying the Agency's assessment factors (http://www.epa.gov/stpc/assess.htm) and the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) guidelines for peer review to evaluate the quality of all scientific and technical information considered in the Hydraulic Fracturing Study.

The assessment factors and guidelines allow EPA to take into consideration different sources of scientific and technical information, and ensures appropriate and consistent review and weight is given to the literature used in the study.

See Appendix B of EPA's peer review handbook to read OMB's Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review.